Explain Why It Is Difficult to Talk Meaningfully About God Essay

Religious lyric poem is defined as the communication of ideas close to God, faith, belief and practice. This explanation pull backs it difficult to let the cat out of the bag purposefully virtually it as each of these words cede concepts behind them and each and every respective(prenominal) interprets these distinguishablely, so spectral diction is different to everyday language, as it only denotes to an somebodys belief and faiths traditions.There argon also many troubles with religious language as a whole as it anthropomorphises God, by using terminology such(prenominal) as Him King and Shepherd this is check and subjects God to get under ones skin kindkind qualities, which is against what The word of honor wants to portray God as. in any case some other problem is that some think that religious language is cognitive, thus something must be known nearly God to talk nitty-grittyfully around it. besides this creates the problem that religious asseverations a tomic number 18 not about objective facts that can be turn up professedly or chimerical entirely atomic number 18 answers to questions that are unable to be validated, as they are based on objective facts that are open to cognition. These issues halt led to religious believers to find shipway in which they can talk about God in a pregnant way and the opposite as non-believers are searching for ways to render religious language meaningless.A group of philosophers called the consistent confident(p)s who as a group did not seek to understand how we gain knowledge of the external world, but how we use language to convey it. They believed that everything that can be verify is important. Thus the chit principle was developed which tell that if it could be experiential tried and true by the five senses then it was meaningful, for example, a house is made of gingerbread, is meaningless as it can be proved false by taking stone samples from the house. Yet this causes a prob lem when talking about philosophical and religious aspects.The logical positivists estimation it was tearless to talk about art, music, moral principle and God as it could never be verified, so couldnt be rendered true or false. Therefore it is meaningless as it is utilize to consider things beyond the human experience and this creates the impossibility to understand to meaning of anything being said. A. J. Ayer a logical positivist introduces two types of tick, strong and weak, to deal with the bankers acquiesceance of scientific and historical propositions which are seek to regard as meaningful ornot. Strong verification is when there is overbearing no doubt that a statement is true, as it is verified through and through sense, for example, It is delightful today. Yet weak verification occurs when some of the observations are not once and for all true or false, for example, humans are made of atoms as this may be accepted by people who were at the beat of the discovery , also future scientific statements are verified by the weak, as they go out only be substantiate in the future not at present.The falsification principle created by Flew, declared that religious statements are meaningless as there nothing which can itemize against a religious believer, as they will not count or accept any of the evidence against their faith. Criticism dies the ending of a thousand qualifications. For example Flew used the story of a draw of a terminally ill child, prayed for God to make their child better, but the child died, the father qualifies this by saying it was Gods decision and maybe Gods love is not merely human love.Tillich believed that religious language was meaningful as it was conveyed through metaphors and symbols, however philosophers such as Paul Edwards thought that disclosure could not be portrayed through the verification principle using empirical evidence thereof symbols dont elude any factual knowledge, and are meaningless. Another crit ique of Tillich is that he stated that metaphors and symbols can be mistranslated and over time the original meaning may have been lost or forgotten therefore considering symbols meaningless as the meaning may have been changed from what was originally intended to represent.Also with the criticism that symbols can be see in any way the various(prenominal) wants to, this is demising the ultimate truth of reality it is act to convey as it may point in a different watchfulness as to which was also originally intended. Overall, the verification and the falsification principles argue that it is not assertable to talk about God meaningful way as it is not potential to prove the existence of God of go verify any of the statements related to God.